Open post

Let The Photo Come To You

Years ago I heard an interview with a street photographer who talked about letting people walk into his shot. He would position the camera with the framing he wanted and then, as people walked through his frame, he would take the photo. I realized later that I often use this technique with birds when shooting sunrises at the beach. I get a tree or a rock lined up with the sun and then wait for a bird to fly through the frame. As you can’t count on birds to always do the right thing, the key is to pick a frame that’s in the vicinity of where they often fly – just as the street photographer would pick frames through which people often walked.

I’ve got an idea for a “come to me” photo that I’m hoping to try out this winter. There’s a parking lot near me where crows love to sit in the trees in large numbers. The leaves are gone now and I’ve seen some potential shots of the crows on the bare tree branches that could look very nice. My plan – on a day when the crows are numerous – is to find a really good set of branches, get framed up, and wait for a crow to enter the frame. BUT there’s a third element that complicates this further… I’d really like some dark, brooding clouds behind the frame.

Now, some might say, in this age of digital manipulation, that I just need a photo of the exact branches, a photo of a crow in a good pose, and a photo of the right clouds – then stick them together. But that’s so new school.

I’m waiting for everything to come together in real time.

Wish me luck!

Open post

Putting More Telephoto Into Your Landscape Photography

I was intrigued by the title of a recent Fstoppers article - Stop Using a Wide Angle Lens for Landscape Photography - mostly because I only use a wide-angle about 20% of the time, so maybe I'm a bit of an outlier.

The piece was making the point that many landscape photographers default to a wide-angle lens, with the result that they may be missing interesting shots that only a telephoto or mid-range lens would pick up. The article uses a great composite shot - shown above - to illustrate what the wide-angle is seeing while the inset shows what a telephoto from that same position could be seeing.

The article isn't saying one lens is better than the other, but rather that landscape photographers would do well to allow themselves to see potential beyond the wide shot. And I couldn't agree more. In fact, I tend to start with the small elements I'm seeing in the landscape around me, and only "think wide" if something really grabs me.

Here's a recent example: I had driven to the beach and it was cloudy, but nothing that I hadn't shot many times before. I was about to drive off when I noticed some breaks in the cloud that - isolated by a telephoto lens - might make for a nice shot. On the left, you see the shot that I had in my mind when I was surveying the beach, while on the right you can see the wide shot from roughly the same place. The wide shot's nothing to write home about and the break in the clouds is barely visible, but by zooming in I think the break in the cloud takes on more drama.

These are taken straighten out of the camera (I tend to shoot a bit underexposed). I see some nice potential in the telephoto shot - probably will work with that in black and white to bring out more of the drama that I see in it.

Scroll to top